Sequence Media Group
All about The Network
Search
Legal Headline News
Follow Us

 

 

 

Fitzgerald Mortons Gallery
The Networks Editorial Blogs
Annuity News Now Widget
Annuity News Now

Scottsdale Custom Home Builder

The Daily Front Page News For The Legal Broadcast Network

News from the Legal Broadcast Network

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Wednesday
Feb152012

Chris Brown's probation continues

(LA Times) As the Grammy's have come and gone it's time to check in on Chris Brown and his probation progress in the infamous Rihanna-assault case.

Brown beat then-girlfriend Rihanna just about three years ago, after a party the night before the GrammyAwards, where she was to perform. She was unable to perform, and he wound up pleading guilty to assault, for which he's serving five years' probation.

And that probation will continue, supervised, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge decided Thursday. Brown's attorney, Mark Geragos, had argued that his client should be allowed to finish supervised probation early, on account of good behavior.

However, Judge George Lomeli sided with prosecutors, and Brown will continue to report to a probation officer in his home state in Virginia.

The R&B singer has already completed a yearlong domestic violence program, anger-management classes and about half of the community service he owes the court.

FLC host Judge Eugene Hyman discusses the reasons for the continuation of supervised probation.

Wednesday
Feb082012

IRS Issues New Rules For Tax-Free Legal Settlements

 

(Forbes) Which personal injury recoveries are tax-free? For almost 80 years, Section 104 of the tax code has made many injury recoveries tax-free, whether you settle or go to court. Up until 1996, just about anything qualified, including emotional distress, defamation or invasion of privacy. SeeDon’t Fail To Consider Taxes When Settling Litigation.

But in 1996, the tax code was changed to say only recoveries for physicalinjuries or physical sickness qualify. Since then, there’s been no end of litigation about the scope of this tax exclusion and just how “physical” injuries must be to count. Headaches and insomnia? Not enough. Ditto for stomachaches. See IRS To Collect on Italian Cruise Ship Settlements.

The IRS hasn’t issued a formal interpretation of the “physical” modifier but routinely argues in audits and tax cases that there must be “observable bodily harm”–think bruises or broken bones. But many injuries are internal and much physical sickness can’t be observed with the naked eye. See Are PTSD Recoveries Tax Free?

Read more at Forbes

Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood LLP, in San Francisco.  The author of more than 30 books, including Taxation of Damage Awards & Settlement Payments (4th Ed. 2009 with 2012 Supplement, Tax Institute), he can be reached at Wood@WoodLLP.com.  This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be relied upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified professional.

Wednesday
Feb082012

Alimony reform creates uncertainty for divorcing women

 

A few months ago, legislators in Massachusetts passed the Alimony Reform act of 2011, updating the Commonwealth’s alimony laws.

Now, citizens’ groups in Florida and New Jersey are pushing for the same kinds of changes in those states.

Judge Eugene Hyman, retired Superior Court Santa Clara, California says this kind of reform can really make it impossible for many divorcing women to move on financially.

Wednesday
Feb082012

More on the California Prop 8 Ruling

 

Democratic political consultant Brad Bannon takes a look at yesterday's 9th Circuit ruling that California's Proposition 8 is unconstituional.

Wednesday
Feb082012

California Prop 8 Declared Unconstitutional by 9th Circuit

Legal experts said that a federal appeals court's ruling that Proposition 8 -- California's 2008 voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage -- is unconstitutional is so narrowly written that it is an open question as to whether the U.S. Supreme Court will take the case. The 2-1 ruling by a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was written to limit its scope to California's borders and possibly even avoid review by the U.S. Supreme Court, legal experts said. That could mean the 9th Circuit might have the final word on Proposition 8 because the ruling was so pointedly limited to California, a state where, the justices ruled, voters stripped a minority of a right that already existed and where the usual justifications for a same-sex marriage ban -- responsible parenting and procreation -- are undercut by domestic partner laws.

Family Law Channel  host Judge Eugene Hyman says gay marriage proponents may prefer to avoid the "conservative leaning" Supreme Court. Hyman also says the ruling does say Prop 8 is unconstitutional but doesn't broadly declare gay marriage legal.